By N.J.A. Sloane

ISBN-10: 3211813039

ISBN-13: 9783211813034

ISBN-10: 3709128641

ISBN-13: 9783709128640

Show description

Read Online or Download A Short Course on Error Correcting Codes PDF

Similar computer science books

Lessons Learned in Software Testing: A Context-Driven - download pdf or read online

The world's top software program checking out specialists lend you their knowledge and years of expertise that can assist you stay away from the most typical blunders in checking out software program. each one lesson is an statement concerning software program checking out, via a proof or instance that exhibits you the how, whilst, and why of the trying out lesson.

Extra resources for A Short Course on Error Correcting Codes

Example text

11) shows that the codewords ofweight 8 in the extended Golay codeform a 5-(24,8,1) design. Another proof of this result follows from Assmus and Mattson's theorem [60] (which we do not have time to prove here), which says that if a code contains weights 0, T1 ,T2, ••• ,T8 ,nand the dual code has minimum weight d'>s, then the codewords of weight Ti form a (d' -s)-design, for i = 1, ... ,s. 14) Theorem The codewords of weights 8, 12, and 16 in the extended Golay codeform 5 - ( 24 '8' 1) 5 - (24,12,48) 5 - (24,16,78) designs, respectively.

MacWilliams, says that the weigth cnumeration of the dual code ct1 is completely determined just by the weight cnumerator of CC. M. Gleason, states that the weight enumerator of any sclf-dual code (in which the weigth of any codeward isamultiple of 4) is a polynomial in the weigth enumerators of the extended Hamming code and the extended Golay code. This is an extremely powerful theorem for finding the minimum distance of large self-dual codes. lt can also be used to show that certain codes da not exist.

6 says that a polynomial basis for &'(G) can always be found. ) is any polynomial then h<~> = is an invariant of G. Proof. For any A' € G. ) AEG ( 4o 4 8) 0 AEG = .!. g L f(Ax) AEG = h(x) since the last sum is a rearrangement of the one before. D. Furthermore, it is clear that all invariants of G can be obtained in this way. 6 shows that a polynomial basis for the invariants of G can be obtained by averaging over G all monomials. bl b2 x1 x2 bn 000 ~ of total degree l:bi ~ g o More generally, any symmetric function of the g polynomials {f(Ax);AE G} is an invariant of G.

Download PDF sample

A Short Course on Error Correcting Codes by N.J.A. Sloane


by William
4.0

Rated 4.32 of 5 – based on 20 votes